Skip to main content

Value & Pattern: Fascinated By Abstraction

I was surprised to read that Ben Graham is actually not interested in the details of the company, such as what products they make, and so on. Instead, his concern is in the value of the company: A more
abstract concept that is made easier to grasp by accounting numbers. In one occasion, it was said that Ben Graham just looked outside the window and was getting sleepy when an associate gave details of a company. Then, after the end of the brief, Graham just simply said, "But, it is not cheap enough."

I find myself in a similar perspective as him. Frankly, I do not really care about what the company is making, about who is managing the company, and myriad other details. Many people, I believe,
will find it strange. After all, a common requirement often expected by people hiring an equity analyst (in fundamental department) is that the candidate has strong interest in knowing about companies. They are encouraged to learn everything about the companies and  to put it first before the numbers. 

Many people I know, and I believe some of you reading this, will also agree and tend to find comfort when knowing more stories about the company which stock you have interest in. I really don't give much care about any of that. All I want to know is how well the company creates value. In numbers. Equally important, I would also want to know if the expectation implied by the market gives me an opportunity. Only after I know the answer of these two questions, which can not be answered simply
by reading newspaper and gossips, shall I dig deeper. I am interested in the numbers of value. I, to say the least, am dispassionate of the company itself. I believe Ben Graham would be so excited if EVA was conceived in his time.

When talking about price movement, I also have interest mainly in pattern (Elliott Wave). Pattern is a more abstract concept because your mind has to make something to make the pattern comes alive. Certainly it is a more abstract concept than the fact that a certain stock just climbed 10% in a single day or a certain person or groups just bought some stocks. Many people will clamor to that. I, on the other hand, am quite dispassionate about any of that. In most  of the time, I only am interested if the stock movement creates a wave pattern. For all I know, stocks could move up or down. They could easily going up for 7%-15% in a single day depending on how low its share price is.

Sometimes I find it troubling when I realized that when people talk about a stock, I care not much about the company nor how the price is going today. It is a strange world.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Technical Analysis (Wyckoff & Elliott Wave) On BWPT & AALI

BWPT You will likely find these contracting trendline to be very important. Elliott Wave practitioners know the significance of this chart by looking at the possible wedge formation. AALI The expected test of supply came in bar 2 after we saw supply entered in bar 1. Bar 3 suggests that the test was successful. I expect to see an increased in volume when the market exceeds the top of bar 1 to confirm that the buying from May 25 is genuine. Unsurprisingly, analysis in BWPT also suggests an important play is coming shortly.

Illusions of Acquisition Value

Continued fromPart 1: How to Calculate Acquisition Value Saya kurang tahu mengenai PGAS, dan bukan maksud saya di tulisan ini untuk menilai apakah value addition sekitar Rp 9 T dari manajemen masuk akal atau tidak. Tapi saya ingin memberi sedikit perspektif mengenai konsep franchise value. Franchise value tercipta karena Pertagas ada di tangan manajemen yang lebih baik. Tangan yang lebih baik. Banyak analis yang memberi outlook optimis dari akuisisi dengan alasan kalau akuisisi membuat sales buyer menjadi lebih besar karena pipeline PGAS menjadi lebih panjang dengan ditambahnya pipeline milik Pertagas. Tapi pipeline Pertagas sudah masuk ke dalam harga beli Rp 16,6 T yang dibayar oleh investor PGAS. Jadi bagaimana bisa hanya mengoperasikan pipeline milik Pertagas, yang mana PGAS bayar dengan premium, bisa memperkaya investor PGAS? Beda ceritanya kalau ceritanya pipeline tersebut tidak perlu dioperasikan oleh karyawan Pertagas lagi, cukup oleh karyawan PGAS tanpa penambahan jumlah...

EVA (Economic Value Added) in Finite-Lived Project Decision Making

I have found EVA (Economic Value Added) measurement to be superior in many ways compared to free cash flow when it comes to evaluating whether a stock of a company is attractive or not. For one thing, and it is a big issue, we just simply don’t know whether it’s a good or a bad thing when free cash flow increases this year. I have found that it is true, just as the theory says, improvement in EVA is good for stocks. That is because EVA is the only measure that more is better than less. That is because EVA has a special relationship with NPV. With its accompanying ratios proposed by Bennett Stewart, it is just that powerful for me as an investor looking for opportunities to invest. I am proud to say that I do not make spreadsheets and financial models just for formality or brain exercise. The insight gained from a spreadsheet focusing on EVA is real. But for all its prowess, I still have an issue that is troubling me. Namely, all of EVA examples that I have read is done, whether im...