Skip to main content

Value & Pattern: Fascinated By Abstraction

I was surprised to read that Ben Graham is actually not interested in the details of the company, such as what products they make, and so on. Instead, his concern is in the value of the company: A more
abstract concept that is made easier to grasp by accounting numbers. In one occasion, it was said that Ben Graham just looked outside the window and was getting sleepy when an associate gave details of a company. Then, after the end of the brief, Graham just simply said, "But, it is not cheap enough."

I find myself in a similar perspective as him. Frankly, I do not really care about what the company is making, about who is managing the company, and myriad other details. Many people, I believe,
will find it strange. After all, a common requirement often expected by people hiring an equity analyst (in fundamental department) is that the candidate has strong interest in knowing about companies. They are encouraged to learn everything about the companies and  to put it first before the numbers. 

Many people I know, and I believe some of you reading this, will also agree and tend to find comfort when knowing more stories about the company which stock you have interest in. I really don't give much care about any of that. All I want to know is how well the company creates value. In numbers. Equally important, I would also want to know if the expectation implied by the market gives me an opportunity. Only after I know the answer of these two questions, which can not be answered simply
by reading newspaper and gossips, shall I dig deeper. I am interested in the numbers of value. I, to say the least, am dispassionate of the company itself. I believe Ben Graham would be so excited if EVA was conceived in his time.

When talking about price movement, I also have interest mainly in pattern (Elliott Wave). Pattern is a more abstract concept because your mind has to make something to make the pattern comes alive. Certainly it is a more abstract concept than the fact that a certain stock just climbed 10% in a single day or a certain person or groups just bought some stocks. Many people will clamor to that. I, on the other hand, am quite dispassionate about any of that. In most  of the time, I only am interested if the stock movement creates a wave pattern. For all I know, stocks could move up or down. They could easily going up for 7%-15% in a single day depending on how low its share price is.

Sometimes I find it troubling when I realized that when people talk about a stock, I care not much about the company nor how the price is going today. It is a strange world.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gain More Understanding With Sensitivity Analysis: BWPT Case

As far as I’m concerned, building a financial model serves two major purposes: 1.        To reverse-engineer share price to get shareholders’ expectation 2.        Finding important factors that affect a company’s value Unfortunately, without a framework that could clearly link performance measurement with value, building a financial model would lack insights in serving those two big purposes. It could easily fall into an exercise just for the sake of formality. A good model gives valuable insights. Generally speaking, I have found that a model that serves the first point (reverse-engineer) is more useful for investing purposes. It may surprise you, but finding implied shareholders’ expectation is possible without making our own future projections. After all, shareholders’ already done that job for us. Read my other articles for this topic. In some specific situations however, namely a concerning negative EVA...
Post a Comment
Read more

Analisa Wyckoff: HOKI (Buyung Poetra Sembada Tbk)

HOKI terus naik. Saatnya mereview kembali. Hal utama pertama: HOKI menembus daerah supply signifikan / resisten di sekitar 780. Sekarang kita lihat lebih detail tiap bar di sekitar resisten ini. Bar 1: Bar pertama saat HOKI menembus resisten penting 780. Kenaikan volume wajar terjadi saat resisten ditembus, tapi posisi closing menunjukkan ada kemungkinan supply besar. Bar 2: Volume masih relatif tinggi, posisi closing, dan pergerakan harga sangat kecil dibanding Bar 1. Semua ini menunjukkan supply besar datang. Bar 3: Smart Money melihat supply signifikan di bar 2 sehingga melakukan ‘test supply’ di bar 3. Dilihat dari volume yang sangat kecil, kelihatannya test ini berhasil. Bar 4: Ternyata tidak. Bar 4 menunjukkan tidak ada demand datang, dan posisi closing di bawah menunjukkan supply kembali muncul. Bar 5: Kelemahan di bar 4 setelah test supply akhirnya membuat Smart Money melakukan manuver ‘shakeout’ di bar 5. Volume meningkat dengan harga dibawa kebawah tapi ...
Post a Comment
Read more

EVA (Economic Value Added) in Finite-Lived Project Decision Making

I have found EVA (Economic Value Added) measurement to be superior in many ways compared to free cash flow when it comes to evaluating whether a stock of a company is attractive or not. For one thing, and it is a big issue, we just simply don’t know whether it’s a good or a bad thing when free cash flow increases this year. I have found that it is true, just as the theory says, improvement in EVA is good for stocks. That is because EVA is the only measure that more is better than less. That is because EVA has a special relationship with NPV. With its accompanying ratios proposed by Bennett Stewart, it is just that powerful for me as an investor looking for opportunities to invest. I am proud to say that I do not make spreadsheets and financial models just for formality or brain exercise. The insight gained from a spreadsheet focusing on EVA is real. But for all its prowess, I still have an issue that is troubling me. Namely, all of EVA examples that I have read is done, whether im...
Post a Comment
Read more